<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Gphone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://linuxchic.net/geekery/no-gphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://linuxchic.net/geekery/no-gphone/</link>
	<description>Crafts, Open Source, &#38; General Geekery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 11:12:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: uberChicGeekChick</title>
		<link>http://linuxchic.net/geekery/no-gphone/comment-page-1/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>uberChicGeekChick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxchic.net/technews/no-gphone/#comment-623</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Argh... openID login redirected me here...&lt;/em&gt;

	So ignore my last comment: I&#039;ve posted it where it belongs.  But now that I&#039;ve noticed this post...

	I&#039;m not surprised, nor disappointed, that there&#039;s no G-Phone.  I hadn&#039;t expected one.  There&#039;s just no good reason for Google to get into hardware manufacturing(even w/a partner).

	I have downloaded the SDK though, and its a &lt;em&gt;sugary sweet software stack&lt;/em&gt;.  &amp;With how open it is I&#039;m personally looking forward to developing for this platform.  Finally a mobile device that I can develop for, minus Nokia&#039;s few Linux based UMPC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Argh&#8230; openID login redirected me here&#8230;</em></p>
<p>	So ignore my last comment: I&#8217;ve posted it where it belongs.  But now that I&#8217;ve noticed this post&#8230;</p>
<p>	I&#8217;m not surprised, nor disappointed, that there&#8217;s no G-Phone.  I hadn&#8217;t expected one.  There&#8217;s just no good reason for Google to get into hardware manufacturing(even w/a partner).</p>
<p>	I have downloaded the SDK though, and its a <em>sugary sweet software stack</em>.  &amp;With how open it is I&#8217;m personally looking forward to developing for this platform.  Finally a mobile device that I can develop for, minus Nokia&#8217;s few Linux based UMPC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberChicGeekChick</title>
		<link>http://linuxchic.net/geekery/no-gphone/comment-page-1/#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>uberChicGeekChick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxchic.net/technews/no-gphone/#comment-621</guid>
		<description>I know what it is,

&lt;em&gt;and it is beautiful&lt;/em&gt;, LOL. &amp;I know how to work on it.  Though I&#039;d rather code something for it.  Admin &amp;hardware work tend to lead to migraines &amp;an angry uberChick.  &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Not a good thing... not for any one&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what it is,</p>
<p><em>and it is beautiful</em>, LOL. &amp;I know how to work on it.  Though I&#8217;d rather code something for it.  Admin &amp;hardware work tend to lead to migraines &amp;an angry uberChick.  <strong><em>Not a good thing&#8230; not for any one</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bblboy54</title>
		<link>http://linuxchic.net/geekery/no-gphone/comment-page-1/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>bblboy54</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 02:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxchic.net/technews/no-gphone/#comment-556</guid>
		<description>I am actually extremely excited about this... it&#039;s so much better than a GPhone.  Google always keeps a good sense of balance in things and it seems that what they do always keeps a single company from ruling the world -- something that is much needed.  This announcement means that every cell phone company is going to have to step up to the plate and actually do something and, most importantly, make it open so that it can be changed.


Is it possible to elect a company as President of The United States? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am actually extremely excited about this&#8230; it&#8217;s so much better than a GPhone.  Google always keeps a good sense of balance in things and it seems that what they do always keeps a single company from ruling the world &#8212; something that is much needed.  This announcement means that every cell phone company is going to have to step up to the plate and actually do something and, most importantly, make it open so that it can be changed.</p>
<p>Is it possible to elect a company as President of The United States? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffisageek</title>
		<link>http://linuxchic.net/geekery/no-gphone/comment-page-1/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffisageek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxchic.net/technews/no-gphone/#comment-555</guid>
		<description>I have to admit I was looking forward to a google phone but hey the whole open source thing could still be pretty kool for mobile phones.

(jeff)isageek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit I was looking forward to a google phone but hey the whole open source thing could still be pretty kool for mobile phones.</p>
<p>(jeff)isageek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
